Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756388Ab1CMBG5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:06:57 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:47459 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756359Ab1CMBGy (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:06:54 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:03:29 -0800 From: Greg KH To: andy.green@linaro.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] PLATFORM: introduce structure to bind async platform data to a dev path name Message-ID: <20110313010329.GB20396@kroah.com> References: <20110312222633.27020.19543.stgit@otae.warmcat.com> <20110312223212.27020.9839.stgit@otae.warmcat.com> <201103130029.38458.rjw@sisk.pl> <4D7C0423.9020204@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D7C0423.9020204@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1399 Lines: 40 On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:39:15PM +0000, Andy Green wrote: > On 03/12/2011 11:29 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > Hi - > > >On Saturday, March 12, 2011, Andy Green wrote: > >>This structure allows tagging arbitrary platform_data that can't be attached > >>to a device until after it is probed, with the device path name that it is > >>to be attached to. > > >>+struct platform_async_platform_data { > >>+ const char *device_path; > >>+ void *platform_data; > >>+}; > >>+ > >> #endif /* _PLATFORM_DEVICE_H_ */ > > > >Using device paths for this purpose seems to be very fragile to me. Isn't > >there any better solution? > > Given that this targets board definition files which commonly do the > platform_add_device for the USB bus controller synchronously, and > the bus-connected devices it is aimed at are soldered on to the > board connected to specific bus controllers, the bus paths are > completely deterministic. No they are not. The physical layout is deterministic, but the bus number, and device number, is not. You are using the bus number here in this path, so that is not going to work, sorry. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/