Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756717Ab1CNBpQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:45:16 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:34119 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752329Ab1CNBpO (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:45:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jLJqRcuJc3zdoyjEDuGuH9+mCGoqmq6IxuNlWSMyHQ9xxMULpQ/TpRAls66n/wa9c1 pcbHGIakx3S4SAke/M+QrSC7yH1R3vYeLyupGZKxZXKhzIhH1May+FRHawaHuk1Rj3vg bktYBI+RwAyXz7z5xxuqJFdvOYikuaLcibH4o= Message-ID: <4D7D7325.2040708@garzik.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:45:09 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Indan Zupancic CC: Ric Wheeler , Arnd Bergmann , Sage Weil , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" , Jonathan Nieder , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, l@jasper.es Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] introduce sys_syncfs to sync a single file system References: <201103111255.44979.arnd@arndb.de> <4D7AC0FE.8070806@gmail.com> <1d4d1b7ae64da97f44cad0e2bda4f832.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> <4D7ADFDD.9080108@gmail.com> <4D7BBC03.3020404@garzik.org> <89481603ed9cfc86efaa039c2dfeb955.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> In-Reply-To: <89481603ed9cfc86efaa039c2dfeb955.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 498 Lines: 15 On 03/13/2011 09:31 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote: > The new syscall works on only one fd too. The behaviour of the proposed > syncfs and an extended sync_file_range is exactly the same. No, it's not. You should read the patch before commenting. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/