Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 22:25:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 22:25:20 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:25663 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 22:25:20 -0400 To: David Weinehall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............ References: <20020713233701.GO29001@khan.acc.umu.se> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 14 Jul 2002 20:16:43 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20020713233701.GO29001@khan.acc.umu.se> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 544 Lines: 11 David Weinehall writes: > > I am about to release 2.0.40 soon, and while 40 is a nice round number, > 42 is an even better number to stop at, so that'll probably be the end > of the road. I like the question. I wonder if the mice ever came up with anything half as good :) Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/