Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755965Ab1CNUaG (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:30:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:54942 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751593Ab1CNUaD (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:30:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=g9t+jmDajL1cob51IliDNa83d0VmGblSDGqBdEwIzz16RTf1Rq8VAhzqxppnsfGHcx B7B3AEny/3Esl3JV85WtIn7ZFrtJlCNIekWWeP6rcJW9jTNsP9dPshZaFzMBa0pzMzAB NPFlaLtqA29JHEgEcZ0wcZsR/thugXdBu738E= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] introduce sys_syncfs to sync a single file system From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: Indan Zupancic , Greg KH , Jonathan Nieder , Arnd Bergmann , Sage Weil , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, l@jasper.es In-Reply-To: <20110314131042.5a7fb32f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <201103111255.44979.arnd@arndb.de> <20110311235607.GB15853@elie> <9446ab1a2315c0d2476c30f8315a0503.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> <20110312021001.GA16833@elie> <20110312173217.GA24981@kroah.com> <1e597aedd3d7825dcc0630b1cf2399fa.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> <20110314131042.5a7fb32f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:29:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1300134595.2332.17.camel@koala> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 714 Lines: 18 On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 13:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > There might one day be a requirement to be able to initiate a > resource-management-style writeback against a whole filesystem. When > that happens, we'll regret not having added a "mode" argument to > sys_syncfs(). I think Indan is right about an additional argument which could be used for future extensions, what is the problem adding it? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/