Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:52:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:52:52 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:26051 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:52:51 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 22:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020714.224517.45499035.davem@redhat.com> To: davidsen@tmr.com Cc: dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG?] unwanted proxy arp in 2.4.19-pre10 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 19 From: Bill Davidsen Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 21:39:12 -0400 (EDT) Clearly FAQ means frequently asked, not answered. I can't find the appropriate patch, clearly some people regard allowing source routing to be a benefit. Source routing exists in every single 2.4.x kernel every released. What are you talking about? There is no patch to speak of, it's already there. Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/