Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758265Ab1COR6b (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:58:31 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:49814 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758228Ab1COR63 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:58:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2.6.38-rc8-tip 7/20] 7: uprobes: store/restore original instruction. From: Peter Zijlstra To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Stephen Wilson , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Linux-mm , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Christoph Hellwig , Andi Kleen , Masami Hiramatsu , Oleg Nesterov , LKML , Jim Keniston , Roland McGrath , SystemTap , Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , Balbir Singh In-Reply-To: <20110315092247.GW24254@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20110314133403.27435.7901.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <20110314133522.27435.45121.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <20110314180914.GA18855@fibrous.localdomain> <20110315092247.GW24254@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:57:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1300211862.2203.302.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1471 Lines: 46 On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 14:52 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * Stephen Wilson [2011-03-14 14:09:14]: > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:05:22PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > static int install_uprobe(struct mm_struct *mm, struct uprobe *uprobe) > > > { > > > - int ret = 0; > > > + struct task_struct *tsk; > > > + int ret = -EINVAL; > > > > > > - /*TODO: install breakpoint */ > > > - if (!ret) > > > + get_task_struct(mm->owner); > > > + tsk = mm->owner; > > > + if (!tsk) > > > + return ret; > > > > I think you need to check that tsk != NULL before calling > > get_task_struct()... > > > > Guess checking for tsk != NULL would only help if and only if we are doing > within rcu. i.e we have to change to something like this > > rcu_read_lock() > if (mm->owner) { > get_task_struct(mm->owner) > tsk = mm->owner; > } > rcu_read_unlock() > if (!tsk) > return ret; so the whole mm->owner semantics seem vague, memcontrol.c doesn't seem consistent in itself, one site uses rcu_dereference() the other site doesn't. Also, the assignments in kernel/fork.c and kernel/exit.c don't use rcu_assign_pointer() and therefore lack the needed write barrier. Git blames Balbir for this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/