Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:50:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:50:39 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:60425 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:50:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:52:59 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Joerg Schilling cc: willy@w.ods.org, Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 In-Reply-To: <200207151127.g6FBRCmc020464@burner.fokus.gmd.de> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 863 Lines: 25 On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: > I would be happy to hear about concepts. Currently it looks as if at > least some people like to keep everything as it is. This is not a > conceptional OS but a grown structure. If you like to keep code > maintainable for a long time, you need to clean up the thicket from time > to time. I couldn't agree more. Now, why do you oppose cleaning up the "use scsi as everyone's mid layer" hack and putting a better generic abstraction in place ? regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/