Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754021Ab1CPUWm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:42 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:55913 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753856Ab1CPUWg (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:36 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=qyUSAyc82z9xLljZQc9ErY9Tl2GSEfqK/XYZS35I9d8= c=1 sm=0 a=9QXU0bjljTkA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=HMbYz5bvLV9qGdviWvIA:9 a=iO9LGUtj3SKfjII-8MzfakOS6xQA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: Typo in linux-2.6.38/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S From: Steven Rostedt To: Eric Vlette Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <4D8118F7.5060107@free.fr> References: <4D80B7EE.40706@Free.fr> <20110316195210.GA14675@home.goodmis.org> <4D8118F7.5060107@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1300306954.16880.51.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1270 Lines: 43 On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 21:09 +0100, Eric Vlette wrote: > On 16/03/2011 20:52, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:15:26PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Trying to compile 2.6.38, I found the follwoing bug. Compiler barks... > > > > New compiler? (new binutils more likely) > > Maybe. I use debian unstable + experimental and upgrade packages almost > everyday... You probably have new binutils. What does "as --version" give you. Binutils 2.21... ? I think it was 2.21 that started giving problems. > > >> > >> diff linux-2.6.38/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S > >> linux-2.6.38/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S~ > >> 1416c1416 > >> < END(async_page_fault) > >> --- > >>> END(apf_page_fault) > > But obviously the begin end is not symmetric as in other function. Right, there was a discussion before about this causing issues with new binutils, and I think Ingo or Thomas said that they had patches to fix these for x86. Which this looks like one. The old binutils never complained. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/