Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754084Ab1CPUcf (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:32:35 -0400 Received: from smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.127]:53188 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753792Ab1CPUc2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:32:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4D811E5A.7080201@free.fr> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:32:26 +0100 From: Eric Valette Reply-To: eric.valette@free.fr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110309 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Typo in linux-2.6.38/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S References: <4D80B7EE.40706@Free.fr> <20110316195210.GA14675@home.goodmis.org> <4D8118F7.5060107@free.fr> <1300306954.16880.51.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <1300306954.16880.51.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1590 Lines: 49 On 16/03/2011 21:22, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 21:09 +0100, Eric Vlette wrote: >> On 16/03/2011 20:52, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:15:26PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Trying to compile 2.6.38, I found the follwoing bug. Compiler barks... >>> >>> New compiler? (new binutils more likely) >> >> Maybe. I use debian unstable + experimental and upgrade packages almost >> everyday... > > You probably have new binutils. > > What does "as --version" give you. Binutils 2.21... ? Well I found the problem at work and I'm home now but since I use the same distrib and just updated, its probably the same. as --version GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.21.0.20110302 So probably most debian user will soon or late have the problem. > I think it was 2.21 that started giving problems. Sound plausible. >> But obviously the begin end is not symmetric as in other function. > > Right, there was a discussion before about this causing issues with new > binutils, and I think Ingo or Thomas said that they had patches to fix > these for x86. Which this looks like one. > > The old binutils never complained. Anyway this show once again that the world like symetry and you better remember it ;-) (lock/unlock, malloc free, ...) Probably a stable candidate for 2.6.38.1 --eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/