Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:09:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:09:23 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-211.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.211]:40094 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:09:21 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andreas Dilger , Sam Vilain Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:12:50 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Alan Cox , dax@gurulabs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1026490866.5316.41.camel@thud> <20020715160357.GD442@clusterfs.com> In-Reply-To: <20020715160357.GD442@clusterfs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 946 Lines: 22 On Monday 15 July 2002 18:03, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jul 15, 2002 13:02 +0100, Sam Vilain wrote: > > "Yes, we know that there is no directory hashing in ext2/3. You'll > > have to find another solution to the problem, I'm afraid. Why not ease > > the burden on the filesystem by breaking up the task for it, and giving > > it to it in small pieces. That way it's much less likely to choke." > > Amusingly, there IS directory hashing available for ext2 and ext3, and > it is just as fast as reiserfs hashed directories. See: > > http://people.nl.linux.org/~phillips/htree/paper/htree.html Faster, last time I checked. I really must test against XFS and JFS at some point. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/