Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:28:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:28:33 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:1272 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:28:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] sched-2.5.24-D3, batch/idle priority scheduling, SCHED_BATCH From: Robert Love To: Pavel Machek Cc: Ingo Molnar , oleg@tv-sign.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020714122911.GA179@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20020714122911.GA179@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 15 Jul 2002 09:31:13 -0700 Message-Id: <1026750676.940.99.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 523 Lines: 17 On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 05:29, Pavel Machek wrote: > Does it mean that we now have working scheduler class that only > schedules jobs when no other thread wants to run (as long as > SCHED_BATCH task does not enter the kernel)? Yep. Now, is the implementation OK? Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/