Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754563Ab1CQNRu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:17:50 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:42806 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754320Ab1CQNRs (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:17:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=xXVyDEQFH7r6iZa/HoDBUES5CUhRc5SyUCZK5NEYbBi3uorOJccJyDDoFYTqMLv1Hr P4xA8096wJLsPySzx32X6Y/I7HoCqq+bIsBlsGXn/NGS6GSsJsqP0an7P2DB43n/SzBl X0ynCUlNsOTTnzyCpk8RRb70sAGKtihH/qq4I= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] scatterlist: new helper functions From: Maxim Levitsky To: Alex Dubov Cc: Andrew Morton , FUJITA Tomonori , James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <158286.40597.qm@web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <158286.40597.qm@web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:17:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1300367871.7887.4.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1285 Lines: 36 On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 23:41 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote: > > > > Do you believe that any other driver is likely to ue the > > sg > > infrastructure which this patch adds? Should those > > additions be > > internal to the memstick code, at least for now? > > > > Considering the comments from Fujita and James, I suppose it will be best > for now to fold the new sg functions into the memstick patch and > investigate how the block layer functionality can be used to a greater > utility at some later time. I am thinking the same thing. If the unusual sg code is a problem, I'll think of something later to improve it, heck I can even completely rip it off and just use kernel pointers, relying on block core to bounce for high-mem situations. Since its a driver for a legacy hardware, mostly provided for completeness, the performance difference shouldn't be much. I think its ok to merge the code with folded sg code _for_ now, and then I will send patches to address this point you didn't like. OK? Best regards, Maxim Levitsky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/