Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:24:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:24:10 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:11023 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:24:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:23:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Dave Jones cc: Jeff Garzik , Subject: Re: [PATCH] agpgart splitup and cleanup for 2.5.25 In-Reply-To: <20020715184559.C32582@suse.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1006 Lines: 27 On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Dave Jones wrote: > > the .o files get linked into agpgart.o > Still just one module. Christoph Hellwig proposed making each back > end a module too, which is dependant upon agpgart.o, but that's more > pain than I feel like enduring right now.. Maybe later. > > Linus ? I'm perfectly happy with something like "via-agp.c", if it heads off potential future trouble. I just don't like the "agpgart_be" thing, it's unreadable in the first place, too long in the second, and having a prefix (as opposed to a postfix) makes filename completion suck in the third place. Something like "via-agp.c" doesn't have any of those problems, and while the "agp" is slightly redundant in the directory structure, it's at least not ugly. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/