Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:18:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:18:16 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:11015 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:18:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:15:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: JorgP cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What is the most stable kernel to date? In-Reply-To: <120401c229be$58fee4e0$2db2950c@vulcan> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 655 Lines: 17 On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, JorgP wrote: > Has anyone conducted any tests to determine what is the most stable (as in > reliable) kernel available? If you run SMP and high load, you want to go with a recent -ac kernel. Stable is load dependent, and to some degree hardware dependent as well. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/