Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:25:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:25:27 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:11527 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:25:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:22:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: David Weinehall cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............ In-Reply-To: <20020713234920.GP29001@khan.acc.umu.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1125 Lines: 25 On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, David Weinehall wrote: > Really, there is little reason to worry; my contribution to the > development of 2.5 (and a forthcoming 2.6/2.7/2.8/...) would probably > not be much larger were I to drop maintenance of the 2.0-tree. Possibly, > Marcello and Linus would receive a few more odd fixes for typos and > the Config-files, and maybe some MCA-related fixes, but as things stand > right now, the fact that I only have a dialup-connection stands between > me and serious development (anyone care to sponsor a > faster connection or hire me?) Out of curiousity, just what will UML run? Can you run 2.0 kernels under UML? Older than that? Your mention about the pain of upgrading strikes home. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/