Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317632AbSGOT1f>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:27:35 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S317630AbSGOT1e>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:27:34 -0400
Received: from freeside.toyota.com ([63.87.74.7]:13323 "EHLO
	freeside.toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S317629AbSGOT1d>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:27:33 -0400
Message-ID: <3D3322CC.9080302@lexus.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:30:20 -0700
From: J Sloan <jjs@lexus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020607
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CC: JorgP <jorgp@bartnet.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020715151328.25239A-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 676
Lines: 26

Bill Davidsen wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, JorgP wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Has anyone conducted any tests to determine what is the most stable (as in
>>reliable) kernel available?
>>    
>>
>
>If you run SMP and high load, you want to go with a recent -ac kernel.
>Stable is load dependent, and to some degree hardware dependent as well.
>  
>
I have solved a good many problems on
production servers by running -aa kernels
as well -

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/