Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756136Ab1CRFp3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:45:29 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:60059 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750919Ab1CRFpW (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:45:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:45:17 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: Andres Salomon Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Daniel Drake , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] switch DT creation to using of_attach_node (v2) Message-ID: <20110318054517.GI18545@angua.secretlab.ca> References: <1300408356-15253-1-git-send-email-dilinger@queued.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1300408356-15253-1-git-send-email-dilinger@queued.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 797 Lines: 20 On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:32:32PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > This is attempt #2 to make OF core use of_attach_node for both promtree > and flattree building. This reworks of_attach_node quite a bit to conform > with our expectations of how the DT should look in memory. > > It's different in many ways from the original patches, so it's worth > reviewing each in their entirety. Thanks Andres, Ping me on this stuff after the merge window. I don't have time to look at it now, but I'll do so right all the stuff for .39 is taken care of. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/