Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752762Ab1CUFR1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:17:27 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:56205 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751805Ab1CUFR0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:17:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:17:25 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Chris Mason Cc: linux-kernel , linux-btrfs Subject: Re: [RFC] a couple of i_nlink fixes in btrfs Message-ID: <20110321051725.GS22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20110304171353.GU22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1299517070-sup-1687@think> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1299517070-sup-1687@think> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 500 Lines: 12 On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:58:13AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > Thanks, these both look good but I'll test here as well. Are you > planning on pushing for .38? No, but .39 would be nice ;-) Do you want that to go through btrfs tree or through vfs one? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/