Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754359Ab1CVFof (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:44:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:61286 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754030Ab1CVFoc (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:44:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=X8tIKlmftZX0zCrBTgns8mesYDWtq1TyvNsm6qi1cNu6aR6CRzeG21sI1tGGVUoUz5 TZ8Pp+e9ke1nzeL+voPCiAaeUiPujnQ1EgD6qbLfLI+ZB8EWfiV/sFRZJDv/Dxo2mCvu mdDVthKZ4S/i3SPFU/SpN5/41JgjQ8AgrmfiA= Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:44:16 +0800 From: Harry Wei To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC]A question about kernel's development Message-ID: <20110322054412.GA2856@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20110322033312.GA2219@gmail.com> <20110322035148.GM14675@home.goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110322035148.GM14675@home.goodmis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1898 Lines: 49 On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:51:48PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:33:14AM +0800, Harry Wei wrote: > > Hi us, > > I wanna know our kernel's development > > procedure for details. I just realize > > when we get a stable release, we must > > merge trementous patches into kernel. > > I often watch -rc kernels, -git kernels, > > , -mm kernels and know their promulgators. > > But i don't know their relationships and > > sequences for shaping stable ones. > > Well, a quick answer is that when we fix a bug, we tag it with > Cc: stable@kernel.org > > Then when it is applied to Linus's tree, Greg then can choose to pull it > into the stable branch. Yeah, it is true. > > I also believe that Greg spends lots of lonely nights looking into git > commits, drinking his favorite Latte and cursing at all the git patches > that fix a bug that didn't have a Cc: stable tag attached. He use to > have a huge mane of hair on his head before taking over as stable > maintainer ;) Hmmm, so we should learn all the details, which can ease maintainers' burden. Steven, thanks for your help. Thanks. Best Regards. Harry Wei. > > -- Steve > > > Okay, now we want to develop 2.6.38 > > to 2.6.39. How many specific steps should we > > do? In fact, i recognize some. But i want to > > understand all the concrete procedures. Could > > anyone help me, thanks in advance. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/