Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752919Ab1CWBEI (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:04:08 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:47214 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751899Ab1CWBEG (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:04:06 -0400 Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: andy.green@linaro.org Cc: Jaswinder Singh , Linux USB list , lkml , arnd@arndb.de, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, roger.quadros@nokia.com, greg@kroah.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, Nicolas Pitre In-Reply-To: <4D8924B6.8040403@linaro.org> References: <4D79F068.2080009@linaro.org> <1300828125.2402.300.camel@pasglop> <4D8924B6.8040403@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:03:39 +1100 Message-ID: <1300842219.2402.309.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 766 Lines: 21 On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 22:37 +0000, Andy Green wrote: > > that a device-tree based approach is much better in the long run > (and > > more flexible) despite Andy odd quasi-religious aversion for it. > > As Mark Brown wrote earlier about this, the Device Tree > "implementation > just isn't there in mainline". Right and will take even longer to get there as long as short sighted people like yourself appear to run some kind of religious battle against it for no good technical reason that I can fathom so far. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/