Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:19:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:19:58 -0400 Received: from mm02snlnto.sandia.gov ([132.175.109.21]:14599 "HELO mm02snlnto.sandia.gov") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:19:56 -0400 X-Server-Uuid: 95b8ca9b-fe4b-44f7-8977-a6cb2d3025ff Message-ID: <03781128C7B74B4DBC27C55859C9D73809840661@es06snlnt> From: "Shipman, Jeffrey E" To: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Using large amounts of memory in the kernel Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:22:51 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-Filter-Version: 1.8 (sass2426) X-WSS-ID: 112AE62A242055-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 656 Lines: 16 I've got a hash table of packet manipulation information I need to use inside of a module in my kernel. The problem is that this hash table is around 2MB. I'm trying to figure out ways to shrink this table, but I'm coming up short on ideas. What would be a good way to be able to allocate enough memory to store all of this information? Jeff Shipman - CCD Sandia National Laboratories (505) 844-1158 / MS-1372 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/