Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932788Ab1CWMhl (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:37:41 -0400 Received: from fifo99.com ([67.223.236.141]:51815 "EHLO fifo99.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932767Ab1CWMhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:37:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] msm: Peripheral Image Loader (PIL) driver From: Daniel Walker To: David Brown Cc: Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Saravana Kannan In-Reply-To: <8ya62riucx0.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <1299732274-10742-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1299732274-10742-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1300270820.13755.14.camel@desktop> <8ya62riucx0.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 05:37:36 -0700 Message-ID: <1300883856.6117.5.camel@m0nster> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2518 Lines: 69 On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 11:40 -0700, David Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:44 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> On 8660, the modem, dsp, and sensors peripherals require their > >> firmware to be loaded into memory before they can be properly > >> taken out of reset. > >> > >> Drivers are expected to call pil_get() when they wish to load a > >> peripheral. This will initiate multiple firmware_request()s for > >> the metadata and image blobs for a peripheral. Once the image has > >> been loaded into memory, it is validated and brought out of reset > >> via the peripheral reset driver. > > > > Why can't this be part of the generic firmware request API ? > > Can you clarify what you mean by this? The firmware request API is used > to get the firmware itself, which this code uses. This code is what > manages making those calls for the various MSM peripherals that require > firmware. I'm suggesting that you make this part of a generic set of API's . > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig > >> index 997c5bd..25b73b0 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig > >> @@ -210,4 +210,17 @@ config IOMMU_API > >> > >> config MSM_SCM > >> bool > >> + > >> +config MSM_PIL > >> + bool "Peripheral image loading (PIL)" > >> + select FW_LOADER > >> + select MSM_SCM > >> + depends on ARCH_MSM8X60 > >> + help > >> + Some peripherals need to be loaded into memory before they > >> can be > >> + brought out of reset. > >> + > >> + Say yes to support these devices. > >> + > >> + > > > > You shouldn't be adding anything like this to the Kconfig. To me if you > > add stuff like this it's a big red flag. > > Can you clarify what you mean "stuff like this". I was commenting on a Kconfig option so "stuff like this" is a Kconfig option like the one I was commenting on. > It seems to me that this option should be selected by the drivers that > need it, since it doesn't make sense to have this if there are no > drivers that need it, and it is required when those drivers are > included. You want as few selectable Kconfig options in the mach-msm Kconfig as possible. Danil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/