Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932830Ab1CXFup (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:50:45 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.67]:21784 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932684Ab1CXFuo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:50:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kwDBH8g/AoGbwgqaGg/i5JWR+DTzlF4TVGTQoKMXXGPhe/2rxIRxAD/e+jwNQnHQSX /19bY3WSo38ThZGNehwQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110324043652.GA4835@earth.li> References: <20110324043652.GA4835@earth.li> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:50:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re-add quirk for ServerWorks bridge secondary buses To: Jonathan McDowell Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 662 Lines: 15 On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > I have a board with a ServerWorks CIOB-X2 bridge on it (2 in fact) that > is not having the secondary buses off it correctly discovered with > 2.6.38. Is this a regression? If so, what is the newest kernel that still worked? Can you include a dmesg log? I assume that since you don't have a standard BIOS, you don't have ACPI? Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/