Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:01:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:01:42 -0400 Received: from addr-mx02.addr.com ([209.249.147.146]:56836 "EHLO addr-mx02.addr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:01:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [BUG?] unwanted proxy arp in 2.4.19-pre10 From: Daniel Gryniewicz To: Julian Anastasov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 16 Jul 2002 16:04:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1026849894.3520.5.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 28 On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 18:32, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > It seems you don't like the way ARP is replied in Linux. But > note that ARP follows IP, i.e. Linux replies on each device where it > is willing to accept IP for the same path. Such behaviour is caused by > the way IP is set by default in RFC1812: Source Address Validation > is disabled (rp_filter=0). > Okay, I have no problem with this. What I have a problem with is Linux sending an ARP request out an interface and using the address of *another interface* as the tell address. This is just broken. -- Recursion n.: See Recursion. -- Random Shack Data Processing Dictionary - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/