Message-ID: <4D8B4A6F.9040303@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:43:11 -0400
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.38.b3pre.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Valerie Aurora <valerie.aurora@gmail.com>, miklos@szeredi.hu
CC: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Union mounts comparison with overlay file system prototype?
References: <1300845590-14184-1-git-send-email-valerie.aurora@gmail.com> <AANLkTim7q5L9v5uFx9NB2Eai48WCTi5sSSx9yFbQgszi@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim7q5L9v5uFx9NB2Eai48WCTi5sSSx9yFbQgszi@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 687
Lines: 22

On 03/22/2011 10:12 PM, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> And I cc'd linux@vger.kernel.org on all the patches instead of
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - guess I'm really out of the kernel
> business now!  Anyway, if you want your replies to go to lkml, you'll
> have to hand edit the cc list.
>
> -VAL
>
  Val, Miklos,

Can one or both of you summarize what we union mounts and overlay do better or 
worse? Do we need both or just one?

Thanks!

Ric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/