Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754614Ab1CYRtI (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:49:08 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:55359 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754572Ab1CYRtF (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:49:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:48:55 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Josh Triplett , linux-next , LKML , Stephen Rothwell , Randy Dunlap , "Theodore Ts'o" , Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo , Al Viro , Nick Piggin Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?) Message-ID: <20110325174855.GR2322@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20110325155516.GA27484@feather> <20110325164236.GP2322@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 10630 Lines: 185 On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Paul E. McKenney > > wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:55:16AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:05:33PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Sedat Dilek > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > right after I have finished building a new linux-next kernel, booting > >>> > > into desktop and archiving my build-tree (ext4) as tarball to an > >>> > > external USB harddisk (partition there is ext3). > >>> > > ( Yesterday, I have seen similiar call-traces in my logs, but it was > >>> > > hard to reproduce [1]. ) > >>> > > I am unsure from where the problem aroses, if you have a hint, let me know. > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards, > >>> > > - Sedat - > >>> > > > >>> > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/24/268 > >>> > > > >>> > > P.S.: Attached are the dmesg outputs and my kernel-config > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > I turned off the notebook for about 2hrs to avoid thermal problems and > >>> > hoax reports. > >>> > Jumped into desktop and started an archive job as 1st job while doing daily job. > >>> > Yeah, it is reproducible. > >>> [...] > >>> > [ ?212.453822] EXT3-fs (sdb5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode > >>> > [ ?273.224044] INFO: rcu_sched_state detected stall on CPU 0 (t=15000 jiffies) > >>> > >>> 15000 jiffies matches this 60-second gap, assuming you use HZ=250. > >>> > >>> > [ ?273.224059] sending NMI to all CPUs: > >>> > [ ?273.224074] NMI backtrace for cpu 0 > >>> > [ ?273.224081] Modules linked in: ext3 jbd bnep rfcomm bluetooth aes_i586 aes_generic binfmt_misc ppdev acpi_cpufreq mperf cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_userspace lp cpufreq_stats cpufreq_conservative fuse snd_intel8x0 snd_intel8x0m snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm radeon thinkpad_acpi snd_seq_midi pcmcia ttm snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event drm_kms_helper yenta_socket snd_seq pcmcia_rsrc drm pcmcia_core joydev snd_timer snd_seq_device snd i2c_algo_bit tpm_tis shpchp i2c_i801 tpm nsc_ircc irda snd_page_alloc soundcore pci_hotplug rng_core i2c_core tpm_bios psmouse crc_ccitt nvram parport_pc pcspkr parport evdev battery video ac processor power_supply serio_raw button arc4 ecb ath5k ath mac80211 cfg80211 rfkill autofs4 ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod usbhid hid usb_storage uas sg sd_mod sr_mod crc_t10dif cdrom ata_generic ata_piix libata uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore scsi_mod thermal e1000 thermal_sys floppy [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > >>> > [ ?273.224367] > >>> > [ ?273.224377] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.38-next20110325-2-686-iniza #1 IBM 2374SG6/2374SG6 > >>> > [ ?273.224397] EIP: 0060:[] EFLAGS: 00000807 CPU: 0 > >>> > [ ?273.224414] EIP is at delay_tsc+0x16/0x5e > >>> > [ ?273.224424] EAX: 00090d42 EBX: 00002710 ECX: c133faf5 EDX: 00090d41 > >>> > [ ?273.224435] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00090d42 EBP: f5819e9c ESP: f5819e8c > >>> > [ ?273.224445] ?DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 > >>> > [ ?273.224458] Process swapper (pid: 0, ti=f5818000 task=c13e3fa0 task.ti=c13b6000) > >>> > [ ?273.224466] Stack: > >>> > [ ?273.224472] ?00090d41 00002710 c13ee580 c13ee600 f5819ea4 c115149f f5819eac c11514bb > >>> > [ ?273.224497] ?f5819eb8 c1016532 c13ee580 f5819ed4 c1078dc1 c134e61e c134e6c2 00000000 > >>> > [ ?273.224520] ?00003a98 f5c03488 f5819ee8 c1078e36 00000000 00000000 c13e3fa0 f5819ef4 > >>> > [ ?273.224544] Call Trace: > >>> > [ ?273.224559] ?[] __delay+0x9/0xb > >>> > [ ?273.224571] ?[] __const_udelay+0x1a/0x1c > >>> > [ ?273.224590] ?[] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x50/0x62 > >>> > [ ?273.224608] ?[] check_cpu_stall+0x58/0xb8 > >>> > [ ?273.224622] ?[] __rcu_pending+0x15/0xc4 > >>> > [ ?273.224637] ?[] rcu_check_callbacks+0x6d/0x93 > >>> > [ ?273.224652] ?[] update_process_times+0x2d/0x58 > >>> > [ ?273.224666] ?[] tick_sched_timer+0x6b/0x9a > >>> > [ ?273.224682] ?[] __run_hrtimer+0x9c/0x111 > >>> > [ ?273.224694] ?[] ? tick_sched_timer+0x0/0x9a > >>> > [ ?273.224708] ?[] hrtimer_interrupt+0xd6/0x1bb > >>> > [ ?273.224727] ?[] tick_do_broadcast.constprop.4+0x38/0x6a > >>> > [ ?273.224741] ?[] tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast+0xad/0xe1 > >>> > [ ?273.224757] ?[] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.224772] ?[] timer_interrupt+0x15/0x1c > >>> > [ ?273.224785] ?[] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4e/0x164 > >>> > [ ?273.224799] ?[] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.224811] ?[] handle_irq_event+0x36/0x51 > >>> > [ ?273.224824] ?[] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.224837] ?[] handle_level_irq+0x4d/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.224845] ? > >>> > [ ?273.224857] ?[] ? do_IRQ+0x35/0x80 > >>> > [ ?273.224871] ?[] ? common_interrupt+0x30/0x38 > >>> > [ ?273.224886] ?[] ? destroy_worker+0x52/0x6c > >>> > [ ?273.224922] ?[] ? arch_local_irq_enable+0x5/0xb [processor] > >>> > [ ?273.224947] ?[] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x100/0x138 [processor] > >>> > [ ?273.224964] ?[] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xc2/0x137 > >>> > [ ?273.224978] ?[] ? cpu_idle+0x89/0xa3 > >>> > [ ?273.224995] ?[] ? rest_init+0x58/0x5a > >>> > [ ?273.225008] ?[] ? start_kernel+0x315/0x31a > >>> > [ ?273.225022] ?[] ? i386_start_kernel+0xa2/0xaa > >>> > [ ?273.225029] Code: e5 e8 d6 ff ff ff 5d c3 55 89 e5 8d 04 80 e8 c9 ff ff ff 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 89 c7 56 53 52 64 8b 35 04 20 47 c1 8d 76 00 0f ae e8 6b ff ff ff 89 c3 8d 76 00 0f ae e8 e8 5e ff ff ff 89 c2 29 > >>> > [ ?273.225154] Call Trace: > >>> > [ ?273.225166] ?[] __delay+0x9/0xb > >>> > [ ?273.225178] ?[] __const_udelay+0x1a/0x1c > >>> > [ ?273.225192] ?[] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x50/0x62 > >>> > [ ?273.225207] ?[] check_cpu_stall+0x58/0xb8 > >>> > [ ?273.225220] ?[] __rcu_pending+0x15/0xc4 > >>> > [ ?273.225234] ?[] rcu_check_callbacks+0x6d/0x93 > >>> > [ ?273.225247] ?[] update_process_times+0x2d/0x58 > >>> > [ ?273.225260] ?[] tick_sched_timer+0x6b/0x9a > >>> > [ ?273.225274] ?[] __run_hrtimer+0x9c/0x111 > >>> > [ ?273.225286] ?[] ? tick_sched_timer+0x0/0x9a > >>> > [ ?273.225300] ?[] hrtimer_interrupt+0xd6/0x1bb > >>> > [ ?273.225316] ?[] tick_do_broadcast.constprop.4+0x38/0x6a > >>> > [ ?273.225330] ?[] tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast+0xad/0xe1 > >>> > [ ?273.225345] ?[] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.225358] ?[] timer_interrupt+0x15/0x1c > >>> > [ ?273.225370] ?[] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4e/0x164 > >>> > [ ?273.225384] ?[] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.225396] ?[] handle_irq_event+0x36/0x51 > >>> > [ ?273.225409] ?[] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.225421] ?[] handle_level_irq+0x4d/0x63 > >>> > [ ?273.225429] ? ?[] ? do_IRQ+0x35/0x80 > >>> > [ ?273.225450] ?[] ? common_interrupt+0x30/0x38 > >>> > [ ?273.225464] ?[] ? destroy_worker+0x52/0x6c > >>> > [ ?273.225493] ?[] ? arch_local_irq_enable+0x5/0xb [processor] > >>> > [ ?273.225517] ?[] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x100/0x138 [processor] > >>> > [ ?273.225532] ?[] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xc2/0x137 > >>> > [ ?273.225545] ?[] ? cpu_idle+0x89/0xa3 > >>> > [ ?273.225559] ?[] ? rest_init+0x58/0x5a > >>> > [ ?273.225571] ?[] ? start_kernel+0x315/0x31a > >>> > [ ?273.225584] ?[] ? i386_start_kernel+0xa2/0xaa > >>> > >>> Interesting. ?Looks like RCU detected a stall while the CPU sits in > >>> cpu_idle. ?That *shouldn't* happen... > >> > >> There have been a few of these things recently that turned out to > >> be BIOS misconfigurations, though that would not be the first thing > >> I would suspect if the system had run other versions successfully. > >> Another possibility is that the CPU spent the full time in interrupt. > >> Get an interrupt from the idle loop, stay in interrupt for 60 seconds, > >> get an RCU CPU stall warning. > >> > >> Or I could have somehow inserted a bug in RCU. ?But I am not seeing > >> this in my testing. > >> > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Thanx, Paul > >> > > > > The problems started when I first saw CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60 > > in my configs. > > > > This an old IBM T40p notebook with Pentium-M (Banias) UP processor. > > IIRC I have flashed the latest BIOS available for this notebook. > > > > [ ? 11.786073] thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad BIOS 1RETDRWW (3.23 ), EC 1RHT71WW-3.04 > > [ ? 11.786111] thinkpad_acpi: IBM ThinkPad T40p, model 2374SG6 > > > > As I am still sitting in the dark, it would be very helpful to know if > > I can play with HZ or RCU kernel-config parameters. > > Can I change RCU behaviour from user-space? > > > > - Sedat - > > > > P.S.: Note to myself: Read Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt & check > > possible values in lib/Kconfig.debug > > > > OK, I had a deeper look at the RCU (STALL) kernel-configs. > > $ grep RCU /boot/config-2.6.38-next20110323-3-686-iniza | grep STALL > # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set > > $ grep RCU /boot/config-2.6.38-next20110324-2-686-iniza | grep STALL > # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set > > $ grep RCU /boot/config-2.6.38-next20110325-2-686-iniza | grep STALL > CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60 Yep, you moved from a kernel version that had the stall detected disabled by default to one that enables it by default. But -next has had stall detection enabled by default for a good long time now. > With my todays (next-20110325) linux-next kernel I cannot work! > The yesterday call-traces could be indeed a different issue (I am > currently testing with the 2 patches from block-tree [1]). > > Now, I am building a new linux-next kernel with CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y as > recommended in Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt file. You had CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y earlier? Tiny RCU does not have a stall detector. Thanx, Paul > - Sedat - > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/25/326 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/