Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753608Ab1C0Oby (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:31:54 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:65421 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753545Ab1C0Obx (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:31:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:references:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fYvlU5icRKO1inKmSbUB0Vl2ojC/UNAwx8eX7B3B9BfAVo10klSX7rTP+/c0+iuITE qtU84tqWF/LQJ8N7XDdiO4/2FEKIUs6XWzJlXe5RwydMsQGhmWKjGI6bBTOs9ZcZxqa1 W1Vzopr8MjpgkqJZG4UsNISvyqOlD50z3uHaA= Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:31:46 +0800 From: "wanlong.gao" To: "Alexey Dobriyan" Cc: "greg" , "harryxiyou" , "linux-kernel" References: <1301195244-4606-1-git-send-email-wanlong.gao@gmail.com>, <20110327125359.GA5816@p183.telecom.by> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Fixed the format: lines over 80 characters . Message-ID: <201103272231385006098@gmail.com> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 23 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id p2REWMGh004309 Content-Length: 1024 Lines: 24 But if you read the code in the 80 columns screen , isn't it less readable with the code over 80 characters ? ------------------------------------------------------------- ?????ˣ?Alexey Dobriyan ???????ڣ?2011-03-27 21:54:05 ?ռ??ˣ?wanlong.gao ???ͣ?greg; harryxiyou; linux-kernel ???⣺Re: [PATCH] Fixed the format: lines over 80 characters . On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:07:24AM +0800, wanlong.gao@gmail.com wrote: > Lines over 80 characters > static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(cmodio_pci_ids) = { > - { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9030, PCI_VENDOR_ID_JANZ, 0x0101 }, > - { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9050, PCI_VENDOR_ID_JANZ, 0x0100 }, > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9030, > + PCI_VENDOR_ID_JANZ, 0x0101 }, > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9050, > + PCI_VENDOR_ID_JANZ, 0x0100 }, NAK, this is less readable. ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?