Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:15:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:15:40 -0400 Received: from web14806.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.224.222]:60178 "HELO web14806.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:15:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20020717161834.12994.qmail@web14806.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:18:34 -0700 (PDT) From: spy9599 Subject: Is TCP CA_LOSS to CA_RECOVERY possible To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 983 Lines: 30 Hi, I have a question regrading the TCP implementation. I am not subscribed to this list, so please cc your response. In the present TCP (2.5.x) implementation, the TCP sender never exits TCP_CA_Loss state until all packets upto high_seq are acknowledged. But lets say while doing retransmissions, some packet less than high_seq are lost again. Ideally the TCP sender should just enter fast retransmit and fast recovery, but from the present implementation it seems the only way to come out of it is after a timeout. Could somebody explain this to me please. Thank you very much. Best Regards --SPY __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/