Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:32:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:32:35 -0400 Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.165]:58824 "HELO sex.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:32:35 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200207171735.VAA20796@sex.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: Is TCP CA_LOSS to CA_RECOVERY possible To: spy9599@yahoo.COM (spy9599) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:35:06 +0400 (MSD) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020717161834.12994.qmail@web14806.mail.yahoo.com> from "spy9599" at Jul 17, 2 08:45:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 568 Lines: 15 Hello! > are lost again. Ideally the TCP sender should just > enter fast retransmit and fast recovery, While retransmitting after timeout and until all the segments sent to the time when retrasmit started, fast retransmit is prohibited by Floyd's block. Look into RFC2582 for explanations, keyword is "send_high". Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/