Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:22:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:22:45 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:24068 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:22:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 17:25:27 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Daniel Phillips cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: [patch 1/13] minimal rmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 837 Lines: 25 On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Yes, I've always felt that at least one new list is needed to do the job > > properly, and there are other considerations as well. > > > Obviously we don't want to be adding new lists and other experimental > > cruft just now. > > I know it's against a long-standing tradition, but I'd really > like to get changes like this in _before_ the code change. Code _freeze_ that is, duh. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/