Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:46:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:46:49 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:37384 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:46:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 17:39:54 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Daniel Phillips cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: [patch 1/13] minimal rmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 967 Lines: 28 On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > Yes, I've always felt that at least one new list is needed to do the job > > > > properly, and there are other considerations as well. > > > > > > > Obviously we don't want to be adding new lists and other experimental > > > > cruft just now. > Is the halloween freeze a code freeze? I thought it was a feature freeze. It is, but changing the way the VM works is also something that should be done before a feature freeze. After the freeze we really shouldn't "innovate" a lot and spend more time tweaking whatever we have into perfection. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/