Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:42:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:42:35 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-038-064.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.64]:64190 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:42:34 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Robert Love , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [patch 1/13] minimal rmap Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:46:15 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , lkml References: <1026938562.1085.59.camel@sinai> In-Reply-To: <1026938562.1085.59.camel@sinai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1027 Lines: 26 On Wednesday 17 July 2002 22:42, Robert Love wrote: > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 13:37, Rik van Riel wrote: > > I don't agree with this, for a very simple reason. > > > > The current rmap patch was created in order to change the > > VM behaviour as little as possible and ONLY provide an > > infrastructure. Benchmarking a completely untuned thing > > that was built to not change anything is bound to give > > meaningless results. > > > > I say we _use_ the infrastructure that akpm is trying to > > get merged now in order to implement something useful. > > I do agree with Rik here. Once the basic rmap infrastructure is merged > we need to work on implementing stuff on top of it or else there is no > point. Well then we all agree, because that's just what I said. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/