Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965395Ab1C3Vzk (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:55:40 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:17014 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933359Ab1C3VHA (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:00 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,270,1299484800"; d="scan'208";a="411277129" From: Andi Kleen References: <20110330203.501921634@firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <20110330203.501921634@firstfloor.org> To: anton@samba.org, miltonm@bga.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mingo@elte.hu, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com Subject: [PATCH] [68/275] kernel/smp.c: fix smp_call_function_many() SMP race Message-Id: <20110330210505.45A143E1A05@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6307 Lines: 194 2.6.35-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Anton Blanchard commit 6dc19899958e420a931274b94019e267e2396d3e upstream. I noticed a failure where we hit the following WARN_ON in generic_smp_call_function_interrupt: if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask)) continue; data->csd.func(data->csd.info); refs = atomic_dec_return(&data->refs); WARN_ON(refs < 0); <------------------------- We atomically tested and cleared our bit in the cpumask, and yet the number of cpus left (ie refs) was 0. How can this be? It turns out commit 54fdade1c3332391948ec43530c02c4794a38172 ("generic-ipi: make struct call_function_data lockless") is at fault. It removes locking from smp_call_function_many and in doing so creates a rather complicated race. The problem comes about because: - The smp_call_function_many interrupt handler walks call_function.queue without any locking. - We reuse a percpu data structure in smp_call_function_many. - We do not wait for any RCU grace period before starting the next smp_call_function_many. Imagine a scenario where CPU A does two smp_call_functions back to back, and CPU B does an smp_call_function in between. We concentrate on how CPU C handles the calls: CPU A CPU B CPU C CPU D smp_call_function smp_call_function_interrupt walks call_function.queue sees data from CPU A on list smp_call_function smp_call_function_interrupt walks call_function.queue sees (stale) CPU A on list smp_call_function int clears last ref on A list_del_rcu, unlock smp_call_function reuses percpu *data A data->cpumask sees and clears bit in cpumask might be using old or new fn! decrements refs below 0 set data->refs (too late!) The important thing to note is since the interrupt handler walks a potentially stale call_function.queue without any locking, then another cpu can view the percpu *data structure at any time, even when the owner is in the process of initialising it. The following test case hits the WARN_ON 100% of the time on my PowerPC box (having 128 threads does help :) #include #include #define ITERATIONS 100 static void do_nothing_ipi(void *dummy) { } static void do_ipis(struct work_struct *dummy) { int i; for (i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) smp_call_function(do_nothing_ipi, NULL, 1); printk(KERN_DEBUG "cpu %d finished\n", smp_processor_id()); } static struct work_struct work[NR_CPUS]; static int __init testcase_init(void) { int cpu; for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { INIT_WORK(&work[cpu], do_ipis); schedule_work_on(cpu, &work[cpu]); } return 0; } static void __exit testcase_exit(void) { } module_init(testcase_init) module_exit(testcase_exit) MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Anton Blanchard"); I tried to fix it by ordering the read and the write of ->cpumask and ->refs. In doing so I missed a critical case but Paul McKenney was able to spot my bug thankfully :) To ensure we arent viewing previous iterations the interrupt handler needs to read ->refs then ->cpumask then ->refs _again_. Thanks to Milton Miller and Paul McKenney for helping to debug this issue. [miltonm@bga.com: add WARN_ON and BUG_ON, remove extra read of refs before initial read of mask that doesn't help (also noted by Peter Zijlstra), adjust comments, hopefully clarify scenario ] [miltonm@bga.com: remove excess tests] Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: Milton Miller Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/smp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) Index: linux-2.6.35.y/kernel/smp.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/kernel/smp.c 2011-03-29 22:51:42.804627906 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.35.y/kernel/smp.c 2011-03-29 23:54:08.137794201 -0700 @@ -194,6 +194,24 @@ list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &call_function.queue, csd.list) { int refs; + /* + * Since we walk the list without any locks, we might + * see an entry that was completed, removed from the + * list and is in the process of being reused. + * + * We must check that the cpu is in the cpumask before + * checking the refs, and both must be set before + * executing the callback on this cpu. + */ + + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask)) + continue; + + smp_rmb(); + + if (atomic_read(&data->refs) == 0) + continue; + if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask)) continue; @@ -442,11 +460,21 @@ data = &__get_cpu_var(cfd_data); csd_lock(&data->csd); + BUG_ON(atomic_read(&data->refs) || !cpumask_empty(data->cpumask)); data->csd.func = func; data->csd.info = info; cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask); cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, data->cpumask); + + /* + * To ensure the interrupt handler gets an complete view + * we order the cpumask and refs writes and order the read + * of them in the interrupt handler. In addition we may + * only clear our own cpu bit from the mask. + */ + smp_wmb(); + atomic_set(&data->refs, cpumask_weight(data->cpumask)); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function.lock, flags); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/