Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756689Ab1CaAw3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:52:29 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:34494 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754730Ab1CaAw2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:52:28 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Add VM counters for transparent hugepages Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20110330233050.GG21838@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20110330144507.2c0ecf73.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110330233050.GG21838@one.firstfloor.org> Message-Id: <20110331095251.0EC3.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.56.05 [ja] Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:52:24 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 21 > > Do we still want it? Are we sure we don't want the per-zone numbers? > > At least I still want it and Dave Hansen did too. > > I don't need per zone personally and I remember a strong request from > anyone. Or was there one? If my remember is correct, Only /me puted weak request of per-zone number. To be honest, myself never use this counter, my question was just curious. Then, I'm ok if Andi didn't hit any issue. Andi, But, if anyone will put numa request or numa related bug report in future, Perhaps I might convert it per-zone one. Is this ok? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/