Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933851Ab1CaBvY (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:51:24 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:54102 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933637Ab1CaBvX (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:51:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4D93DE91.1050606@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:53:21 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Michal Marek , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jan Beulich , Ingo Molnar , Alexander van Heukelum , Dipankar Sarma , Andrew Morton , Sam Ravnborg , David Howells , Oleg Nesterov , Roland McGrath , Serge Hallyn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] RCU: Add TASK_RCU_OFFSET References: <4D924FEE.8040804@linux.intel.com> <20110329214704.GM2261@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D9256AF.5000308@linux.intel.com> <20110330004725.GO2261@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D92BECA.50802@cn.fujitsu.com> <4D92DA32.2010809@cn.fujitsu.com> <20110330105505.GA3195@sepie.suse.cz> <1301482656.4859.171.camel@twins> <4D931814.9090100@suse.cz> <4D93D29C.5010702@cn.fujitsu.com> <20110331012155.GZ2255@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20110331012155.GZ2255@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-03-31 09:49:43, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-03-31 09:49:48, Serialize complete at 2011-03-31 09:49:48 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1712 Lines: 45 On 03/31/2011 09:21 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:02:20AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> On 03/30/2011 07:46 PM, Michal Marek wrote: >>> On 30.3.2011 12:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:55 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] headers: Allow for lightweight inclusion of task_struct definition >>>>> >>>>> Factor out a couple of type definitions to
_types.h to allow >>>>> using task_struct without pulling tons of new dependencies via sched.h. >>>> >>>> Urgh, not pretty.. so why not clean up sched.h properly? There's way too >>>> much cruft in there. >>> >>> It was a proof-of-concept to show that it is doable to have proper >>> definition of task_struct in rcupdate.h. Not an entry for any code >>> beauty contest. >>> >>> Michal >>> >> >> I like this cleanup, could you continue for this hard job? I will help you if required. >> >> Ingo & Peter - will you accept the patches when it is done. >> >> Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan > > I certainly like the idea of being able to inline TREE_PREEMPT_RCU's > rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() using normal C code! > > Thanx, Paul > kernel-offset.c can be merged to some branch of your tree for testing inlined TREE_PREEMPT_RCU's rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() before the kernel headers splitting is done. Can the [patch 1/5] be merged to mainline earlier? could you add it to origin/rcu/next? Thanks, Lai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/