Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933915Ab1CaKxd (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:53:33 -0400 Received: from ist.d-labs.de ([213.239.218.44]:33906 "EHLO mx01.d-labs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476Ab1CaKxc (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:53:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:53:05 +0200 From: Florian Mickler To: Paul Bolle Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , kurup_avinash@yahoo.com, maciej.rutecki@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, rjw@sisk.pl, sedat.dilek@gmail.com, zersaa@gmail.com, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][POKE] Skip looking for ioapic overrides when ioapics are not present Message-ID: <20110331125305.1e8c70ba@schatten.dmk.lab> In-Reply-To: <1301561386.1904.15.camel@t41.thuisdomein> References: <1301558489-4198-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <1301561386.1904.15.camel@t41.thuisdomein> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1413 Lines: 40 On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:48:43 +0200 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:01 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > index 68df09b..3940103 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > @@ -3789,6 +3789,9 @@ int acpi_get_override_irq(u32 gsi, int *trigger, int *polarity) > > { > > int ioapic, pin, idx; > > > > + if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC) > > + return -1; > > + > > if (skip_ioapic_setup) > > return -1; > > > > Seems to have the same goal as commit > 678301ecadec24ff77ab310eebf8a32ccddb1850 ("x86, ioapic: Don't warn about > non-existing IOAPICs if we have none"), which got merged in the v2.6.38 > cycle (authored by me, signed off by Ingo Molnar). Maybe Eric's patch is > more correct. I can't say as I was happy with the effect of my patch > (ie, make an uninteresting error disappear) and didn't investigate any > further. I have also no desire to dive into this matter again. > > > Paul > Thanks for letting me know. Sedat, did you actually test with 2.6.38? Regards, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/