Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759224Ab1CaTYg (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:24:36 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:37176 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759000Ab1CaTYe (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:24:34 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=aqMe+0lCtaYvy4h0jyaoPGyq+DPF+P6rPG2xbekoY9Q= c=1 sm=0 a=XYJHFtupD_QA:10 a=Rgs1teazUoIA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=hs8CJ8QxOCh61bsauqwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:24:30 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Dave Hansen Cc: Marek Szyprowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Nazarewicz , Kyungmin Park , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Ankita Garg , Daniel Walker , Johan MOSSBERG , Mel Gorman , Pawel Osciak Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added Message-ID: <20110331192429.GD14441@home.goodmis.org> References: <1301577368-16095-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1301577368-16095-5-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1301587083.31087.1032.camel@nimitz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1301587083.31087.1032.camel@nimitz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1019 Lines: 32 On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:58:03AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:16 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > > > +unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, > > + gfp_t flag) > > +{ > > + unsigned long pfn = start, count; > > + struct page *page; > > + struct zone *zone; > > + int order; > > + > > + VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(start)); > > This seems kinda mean. Could we return an error? I understand that > this is largely going to be an early-boot thing, but surely trying to > punt on crappy input beats a full-on BUG(). > > if (!pfn_valid(start)) > return -1; But still keep the warning? if (WARN_ON(!pfn_valid(start)) return -1; -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/