Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 05:43:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 05:43:49 -0400 Received: from basket.ball.reliam.net ([213.91.6.7]:56838 "HELO basket.ball.reliam.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 05:43:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:48:00 +0200 From: Tobias Rittweiler X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Reply-To: Tobias Rittweiler X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1251977776.20020718114800@uni.de> To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re[3]: 2.5.26 broken on headless boxes In-Reply-To: <20020718010617.GL1096@holomorphy.com> References: <20020717165538.D13352@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20020718010617.GL1096@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3011 Lines: 75 Hello William, Thursday, July 18, 2002, 3:06:17 AM, you wrote: >> [... kernelpanic ...] > Could you reproduce this and get maybe a backtrace and a line number? I just want to say that I do get a similiar panic (i hope it's the same reason and I do not mix up something), the story about the trouble which 2.5.26 is causing I will expound below: -snip- Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 printing eip: c025a9d7 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010202 eax: 00000000 ebx: c039e060 ecx: 00000013 edx: c02db5d4 esi: 00000014 edi: 00000000 ebp: c02dc85c esp: c11f3f98 ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Process init (pid: 1, threadinfo=c11f2000 task=c11f0040) Stack: c02f86cc c02dc85c 00000014 00000000 c02dffc8 c039df41 0008e000 00000005 c039e000 c02f8618 c039df20 c11c5360 00000000 c02589ac c031ebe8 00000000 c02e0746 c11f2000 c02e077f c0105073 00010f00 c02dffc8 c01056a4 00000000 Call Trace: [] [] [] Code: 83 38 00 75 f4 0f b7 c1 c3 8b 54 24 04 8b 4c 24 08 31 c0 49 <0>Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! -snap- Sorry, I am just a guy having free time to test dev-kernels and to report bugs if there are some, but I do not really know what you mean with "backtrace" and how i should discover the effecting line number. Please do not spare with seemingly trivial information. Well then to the 2.5.26 misadventure story: I patched from 2.5.25 to .26 and first it didn't want to be compiled until I created a symlink from /usr/include/asm-generic to /usr/src/linux/include/asm-generic (while /usr/src/linux is a symlink to /usr/src/linux-2.5.26) - for me it seemed as if the makefile doesn't care about include/ in the kernelsource dir, although this file seems to be proper - a failure/ignorance of mine i do not exclude though (if someone want to recommend to use the whole tarball, i tried it already). However, after the creation it compiled using the old config file of 2.5.25. The image did even boot, init stopped though when the gettys should be invoked. So far so bad, I modified the /etc/inittab not to use the vc's but the ordinary console instead - and the kernel successfully booted and I could work. This phenomenon looks like the VCs are broken, but I am absolutely not sure, because none has complained about them so far. To make sure I wanted to build a kernel completely new (and not just using the old configfile), but during the boot of the resulting kernelimage I got the panic above. If somebody wants, I can create a diff between the configfile used by the kernel where the VCs seems to be broken and the one of the kernel causing the panic. -- cheers, Tobias http://freebits.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/