Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:14:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:14:14 -0400 Received: from 12-237-135-160.client.attbi.com ([12.237.135.160]:62980 "EHLO Midgard.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:14:14 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Kelledin Subject: Re: 2.4.18 is not SMP friendly Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:17:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200207180817.12217.kelledin+LKML@skarpsey.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 885 Lines: 24 On Thursday 18 July 2002 08:45 am, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 11:51, devik wrote: > > I someone here running 2.4.18 on PII SMP successfully ? > > PPro in my case but yes. 2.4.18 ought to be pretty solid > except for some annoying bugs you'll only hit if you use > smbfs. I, too, am running a dual PPro box on 2.4.18. It's been solid from the get-go. By the way, what are these bugs with smbfs? I haven't hit them on my dual ppro box, probably because the box never runs as a samba client (just a samba server). -- Kelledin "If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does it still cost four figures to fix?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/