Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752440Ab1DCWTe (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:19:34 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:57462 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751816Ab1DCWTd (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:19:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=q2vOhmHfzJf2iEr29ptRHLTW9U9s91l3MH5vRPBvsUfYOvQ57jPxN35Feh5Q7TIfay p2R+PZnSjjKyboOdkESooFJ7G8Yh1XZkZyM/Degbigt0CYLaHv90bwriTXq+DLwTmAvz yk0uGkzY/Fv7UTe0Per9GAqVpaNvqJZuiuF1M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4D98F1DA.1060203@fusionio.com> References: <20110402112037.ca288d7b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4D98F1DA.1060203@fusionio.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 00:19:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s From: Sedat Dilek To: Jens Axboe Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "dedekind1@gmail.com" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2129 Lines: 53 On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 2011-04-02 13:02, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> cc'ing Jens ... >>>> >>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:22:41 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>>>>>> Cc'ing Artem, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:55:52 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y set, I see in my build.log: >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> MODPOST 2742 modules >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> ERROR: "empty_aops" [fs/ubifs/ubifs.ko] undefined! >>>>>>>>> make[5]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 >>>>>>>>> make[4]: *** [modules] Error 2 >>>>>>>>> make[3]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 >>>>>>>>> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 >>>>>>>>> make[2]: Leaving directory >>>>>>>>> `/home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.39-rc1/debian/build/build_i386_none_686-iniza' >>>>>>>>> >> [...] >>> Just FYI: >>> I contacted Jens last night and he refreshed his for-linus GIT branch. >>> Adding missing include did not fix the issue. >>> I am trying with the attached one. >>> >>> - Sedat - >>> >> >> I have split the single patch into two, first reflects ther build-error. >> The second considers {inode,file}_operations have also undefined >> functions by using "unified" empty_{iops,fops} as used in other fs/* >> files. > > What are these patches against? Not for-next nor my for-linus. > I tested with linux-next (next-20110401) as base and pulled-in your for-linus GIT branch. - Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/