Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755379Ab1DDSvc (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:51:32 -0400 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:35353 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755364Ab1DDSvb (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:51:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:51:20 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Nathan Lynch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code Message-ID: <20110404185119.GB4782@peq.hallyn.com> References: <1298936432-29607-1-git-send-email-ntl@pobox.com> <1298936432-29607-6-git-send-email-ntl@pobox.com> <20110403190324.GD15044@hallyn.com> <1301929228.31531.39.camel@tp-t61> <20110404151017.GA4857@hallyn.com> <1301931608.31531.49.camel@tp-t61> <20110404162753.GA3456@hallyn.com> <20110404104119.78189678.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110404104119.78189678.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1962 Lines: 55 --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org): > On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:27:53 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" wr= ote: >=20 > > Andrew (Cc:d), did you see this thread go by, and it did it look > > in any way more palatable to you? Have you had any thoughts on > > checkpoint/restart in the last few months? Or did that horse quietly > > die over winter? >=20 > argh, it was the victim of LIFO. >=20 > All I can say at this stage is that I'll be interested next time it > comes past, sorry. Thanks, that's good to know. As you know, we started with a minimal patchset, then grew it over time to answer the "but how will you (xyz) without uglifying the kernel". Would you recommend we go back to keeping a separate minimal patchset, or that we develop on the current, pretty feature-full version? I'm not convinced believe there will be bandwidth to keep two trees and do both justice. thanks, -serge --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmhMnAAoJEHmllQITXQdFz4kIAJnRFp4UJ/LE2ycg/vzD+HW8 pCygLgGOayTmoZqyms5T51P3ObbRYY98L3pUMMExc9/kQ8bdeWnH5s7D93QzTHYP 7+PxCW/c3jA8Nc9BOnIImMelUhFCcjyp0YyAHbMQN8Ej5DuAJOrgjwpyAeQRbhUR rR74y8rlOFB+4FEDOpLwnM0xawfTPyW4VB6Vk5/8VjkEaDvcWB+/cuBboMuA8uYO gqH7v1EyJxaeuJ0nAjrnvgDXyCfpWJNmiVVlS/B+x8w+CGRxcd8WBsZ/UU7bAGen NCw17QyVsaAn6KwBU8YZeKZLto39kINHwFyDTjcm6N0EuCQ1JTiRvOiXUO9phRE= =VIBb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/