Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:15:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:15:18 -0400 Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.165]:30592 "HELO sex.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:15:17 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200207181517.TAA00426@sex.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: Networking question To: Jack.Bloch@icn.siemens.com (Bloch, Jack) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:17:45 +0400 (MSD) Cc: maxk@qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <180577A42806D61189D30008C7E632E87939A6@boca213a.boca.ssc.siemens.com> from "Bloch, Jack" at Jul 18, 2 11:11:31 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 465 Lines: 13 Hello! > code code of netif_rx_ni seems to be logically the most correct way since it > will trigger do_softirq directly after the call to netif_rx. Yes, of course. I simply forgot that _ni was evetually added. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/