Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755428Ab1DDTrY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:47:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:48465 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755379Ab1DDTrW (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:47:22 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=aD2+t6MecH4l8/V02ZQAyXxrt3dv5aacPZ9oXy28GAjISGICPfa1qDEvV+9LNvG84n OwfwoovC07Wg83iuDGgP8y6ZhOhPAkbc62CiTMg84hgNN1pk2NuoCKPS21/BPXUN2fD2 5ZjbwcxsCRcqkiGmLC75L5BqFahEBcdLm0nxE= Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-timers: RCU conversion From: Eric Dumazet To: john stultz Cc: Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel , Richard Cochran , ben@iagu.net, Oleg Nesterov In-Reply-To: <1301940501.2319.25.camel@work-vm> References: <20110318123031.GB6066@8bytes.org> <4D871F6C.40207@redhat.com> <4D875842.9050308@redhat.com> <4D8773AA.8030408@redhat.com> <1300726498.2884.493.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D8784A9.8040303@redhat.com> <1300727545.2884.513.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1300746429.2837.20.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1300777760.2837.38.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1301849660.2837.211.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1301940501.2319.25.camel@work-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:47:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1301946437.3021.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 28 Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 11:08 -0700, john stultz a écrit : > On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 18:54 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Andrew, I submitted this patch some time ago and got no feedback from > > Thomas, John, Richard or Paul. > > Sorry about that. Its been on my list. > > It looks ok to me, but I not very familiar with idr locking rules > (though looking at the code the comments state that idr_find can be > safely called the way you do here). Not only comments, but ipc uses rcu locking as well ;) Nadia Derbey did the work on idr and ipc in commits : 983bfb7db303cfde56ae5bbf4e0f2f46e38c9576 (ipc: call idr_find() without locking in ipc_lock()) f9c46d6ea5ce138a886c3a0f10a46130afab75f5 (idr: make idr_find rcu-safe) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/