Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:43:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:43:51 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:20805 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:43:49 -0400 To: Thunder from the hill Cc: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net, hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca, Subject: Re: how to improve the throughput of linux network References: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 18 Jul 2002 09:35:13 -0600 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 830 Lines: 17 Thunder from the hill writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote: > > well only if it was used little amounts, like once every hour, it would > > dynamically unload in between, > > That's ok then. It shouldn't produce significant overhead. But on the > routers that I run I have either no netfilters at all, or they keep > running, so even if they were a module, they'd never have any time to > unload. Only if you have a cron job running rmmod -a will the module unload. The kernel never unloads modules without being asked. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/