Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754337Ab1DDWDU (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:03:20 -0400 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:37257 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752953Ab1DDWDT (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:03:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:03:09 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Nathan Lynch Cc: Oren Laadan , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code Message-ID: <20110404220309.GA10229@peq.hallyn.com> References: <1298936432-29607-1-git-send-email-ntl@pobox.com> <1298936432-29607-6-git-send-email-ntl@pobox.com> <20110403190324.GD15044@hallyn.com> <1301929228.31531.39.camel@tp-t61> <20110404151017.GA4857@hallyn.com> <1301931608.31531.49.camel@tp-t61> <20110404162753.GA3456@hallyn.com> <4D9A00B1.2080002@cs.columbia.edu> <1301953409.31531.130.camel@tp-t61> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1301953409.31531.130.camel@tp-t61> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2088 Lines: 53 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@pobox.com): > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 13:32 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: > > From the technical point of view it *is* a big problem: there are > > very good reasons why we chose a certain design.=20 > >=20 > > If Natahan is suggesting in-kernel tree creation as a temporary thing > > to simplify the code for review - then, given that this patch handles > > a single process, doing so add lots of unnecessary code, all of which > > in the kernel. > >=20 > > If this is the beginning of a permanent approach, then it is totally > > incompatible with what we have done so far, and severely restricts=20 > > the kind of use--cases of the project, potentially making it too > > unattractive for many natural adaptors, like HPC users. Sorry, nack. >=20 > It's not a stopgap measure to "ease review" or whatever; recreating the > task tree in-kernel is a fundamental - and simplifying - part of the I hadn't gotten to that part yet, so I'm on the fence. The API for starting a checkpoint, that I'm not on the fence on. -serge --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmkAdAAoJEHmllQITXQdFgPgH/0Z7FN38XsLCtBToSwRdoSLf F6XIBNg26GXZRv45OCAZTMkcM53FqdJboK9fDGKZNAWH40i+koGJ9xOj/Q5GQG+f wmg32DQw6+GuvInAnOgxQrpne7AA1vJyHcDvZvKWzQqL7Dtok7amJGqBvnXMRd3l z78LvbNU++4F7dP4Uq0crC4yneztHwQ6S8/VaQGD9AReTMFTt4a289gFSjHLUHvg 95tDzNe/U5KP7pui9Qk9J0TVH3Udptp/JcSzncOkzlhNu53FZYus3dZ3eOgB04cl IrzNMeA/KfTFipMON6smWPQePIaL0x4vz7eRMASCvKFadOsVaCPg37IBVeiN25k= =ldML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/