Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:34:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:34:39 -0400 Received: from 12-231-243-94.client.attbi.com ([12.231.243.94]:21766 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:34:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:36:17 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Duncan Sands Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.26 hotplug failure Message-ID: <20020718183617.GI15529@kroah.com> References: <200207180950.42312.duncan.sands@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207180950.42312.duncan.sands@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.21 (i586) Reply-By: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:36:31 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 994 Lines: 26 On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:50:42AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > I just gave 2.5.26 a whirl. The first thing I noticed was > that the hotplug system didn't run the script for my usb > modem... > > kernel: usb.c: USB disconnect on device 2 > kernel: hub.c: new USB device 00:0b.0-2, assigned address 4 > kernel: usb.c: USB device 4 (vend/prod 0x6b9/0x4061) is not claimed by any active driver. > /etc/hotplug/usb.agent: ... no modules for USB product 6b9/4061/0 > > however this works just fine with 2.4.19-rc1 and 2.5.24 (i.e. only difference > is the change in kernel)... But that message is from the hotplug agent, right? What kind of script used to get run, and how was it run (i.e. on network interface registration, etc.) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/