Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:50:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:50:18 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:45040 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:50:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4 From: Robert Love To: Alan Cox Cc: Szakacsits Szabolcs , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1027022323.8154.38.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1027022323.8154.38.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 18 Jul 2002 11:52:19 -0700 Message-Id: <1027018340.1086.134.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 947 Lines: 24 On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 12:58, Alan Cox wrote: > Adjusting the percentages to have a root only zone is doable. It helps > in some conceivable cases but not all. Do people think its important, if > so I'll add it Changing the rules would be easy, but you would need to make the accounting check for root vs non-root and keep track accordingly. Admittedly not hard but not entirely pretty either. I still contend the issues are not related. It would make more sense to me to do resource limits to solve this problem - rlimits are something Rik has on his TODO and supposedly easy to add to rmap. That way people can use strict overcommit, rlimits, neither, or both to meet their needs. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/