Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755550Ab1DFKha (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:37:30 -0400
Received: from ftp.sofha.de ([82.144.60.99]:59159 "EHLO ftp.sofha.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755377Ab1DFKh3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:37:29 -0400
Message-ID: <4D9C4262.1010704@snafu.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:37:22 +0200
From: Oncaphillis <oncaphillis@snafu.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
CC: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com>, libusb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Libusb-devel] Kernel bug message and missing data on libusb_interrupt_transfer
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1104051040440.1972-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1104051040440.1972-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1583
Lines: 47

On 04/05/2011 04:42 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Oncaphillis wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2011 04:13 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Oncaphillis wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now I get
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:2808!
>>>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#2] SMP
>>> Can you duplicate this using either a 2.6.37 or 2.6.38 kernel?
>>>
>>> Alan Stern
>>>
>> The highest kernel version we've tried (as far as i remember) was the
>> 2.6.36. Have there been issues which might have been solved betwen 36
>> and 3(7|8) ?
> I don't know.  But the core kernel developers always want to hear about
> problems reported against the most recent version possible.  If you
> could test 2.6.39-rc1 (or -rc2, which should be released in a day or
> so), that would be even better.
Ok -- kernel 2.6.38.2 together with libusb-1.0.8 seems to behave well.
This was only a minimal overnight test. Not the full functionality we
are trying to implement. But it looks promising.

  Thank you

  O.

>> I'll give it a try.
> Thanks.
>
> Alan Stern
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/