Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:35:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:35:00 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:27276 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:34:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:37:03 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jsimmons@transvirtual.com Subject: Re: 2.5.26 broken on headless boxes Message-ID: <20020718203703.GT1096@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jsimmons@transvirtual.com References: <20020717165538.D13352@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20020718010617.GL1096@holomorphy.com> <20020718142946.L13352@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20020718201857.GS1096@holomorphy.com> <20020718213208.P13352@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020718213208.P13352@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1446 Lines: 35 On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:18:57PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> This is the 4th one of these I've seen in the last two days. Any chance >> of being able to compile with -g and get an addr2line on the EIP? I've >> tried to reproduce it myself, but haven't gotten it to happen yet. On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:32:08PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > seems fairly obvious what's happening with a couple of printks... > printk("visual_init: sw = %p, conswitchp = %p, currcons = %d, init = %d\n", > sw, conswitchp, currcons, init); > gets me the interesting fact that sw & conswitchp are both NULL. > later on, we call: > sw->con_init(vc_cons[currcons].d, init); > which seems like it would be the exact cause, no? Ugh, I should have been able to see this somehow... On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:32:08PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > now whether putting a: > if (!sw) > return; > call into visual_init or whether we should determine earlier never to > call visual_init, I don't know. The people who know about the console > have been conspicuously silent so far... To heck with waiting for them, if you can't boot because of it, I'd say push the patch. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/