Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:05:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:05:37 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.176.19]:47573 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:05:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:08:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: bunk@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de To: Robert Love cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit In-Reply-To: <1026426511.1244.321.camel@sinai> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 849 Lines: 38 On 11 Jul 2002, Robert Love wrote: >... > In the strictest of modes, it should be impossible to allocate more > memory than available and impossible to OOM. All memory failures should > be pushed down to the allocation routines -- malloc, mmap, etc. >... Out of interest: How is assured that it's impossible to OOM when the amount of memory shrinks? IOW: - allocate very much memory - "swapoff -a" > Enjoy, > > Robert Love cu Adrian -- You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/